WAS THE NAXALIST MOVEEMNT A REVOLUTIONARY JOB?

 WAS THE NAXALIST MOVEEMNT A REVOLUTIONARY JOB?

Any such job by the working class to vanish the wage slavery to end the exploitation by disappearing the capitalist private property is a revolutionary job in this epoch.

Therefore, was the Naxalist movement for the same aim? No.

Sure, land distribution among the landless people is nothing but a heinous reactionary effort to reform the capitalist society to protect it by chaining the free men by land by creating such aspiration among the newly land holders that they will not only be happy but also become rich men by producing the crops.

But, they were simply wage slaves in country side in various fields including agriculture thus they were the revolutionary force as the sellers of labour power to produce commodity to accumulate capital.

Undoubtedly, the cause of all such sufferings, miseries, hardship etc of the working class is the private property.

So, no alternate except abolition of the private property by the working class alone for the emancipation of the working class.

But, a newly land holder has become a capitalist not only in thinking but also in reality by the private ownership of the said land. Thus, he became a member of the reactionary peasant.

Therefore, he is trying to do all possible things to be a rich man by all nonsense jobs including political hooliganism and even by involving his babies in his property to work to save money for buying the labor power to produce crops.

Thereby, such newly land holders has become the enemy of the working class. Though, so many of them has lost their land by the rule of the capitalist system, based on private property but failed to protect the private properties of all by the existing conditions of capital.

Military rulers of different countries including Bangladesh also has done the same job by distributing the land among the landless people to protect the moribund capitalism.

Lenin- a claimed socialist leader with success also has done the same thing to destroy the revolutionary concepts to abolish the private property for the emancipation by a new society with social/ common/ commune ownership of the means of production, transportation and communication.

Therefore, have there any difference between the said military rulers and so-called communist Lenin in this case to protect the capitalist society? No.

The Naxalist movement of West Bengal, India has done the same job and has created the aspiration to landless people to be a capitalist by betraying the revolutionary working class.

Sure, any such efforts to protect the capitalist system in this moribund condition of capitalism is a so reactionary job.

So, the leaders of the Naxal movement has done the same reactionary job by the support of the another world famous liar about the capitalism too- the Leninist boss- Mao, the infamous killer of the world and a tactful and cunning servant of the capitalist interest by founding a state of state capitalism and a bogus communist party.

#ICWF